It's my second viewing. My former post went like that:
- begin quote -
Synopsis: A United Nations interpreter overhears a conversation that might signal that a certain African leader is in danger.
Appraisal: The one interesting thing about this film is the set-up of the premise of the film as a metaphor for a political dilemma. The metaphor concerns the question 'can you identify a whispering voice?' which comes about as the protagonist overhears a conversation and is requested to identify its authors. The clarification of the metaphor is done very near the ending, and is contained in the dedicatory of a book. This curious angle aside, this film is mostly an excruciating series of improbabilities, be they political, emotional, or of a simpler kind, such as leaving a threatened politician alone in a room or discussing sensitive political stuff inside a crowded bus.
Rating: 20
- end quote -
Athough I still don't exactly like it, this time I found it far from 'excruciating'. It's too conventional in structure yet sort of fun to watch. Just don't think of it as a realistic picture and it will go down easier, exception made to when it gets down to the characters' more personal bits, which are definitely corny ('list of favorite words'? give me a break...).
The new rating is 40.
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment