Monday, April 28, 2008
I Dream of Jeannie: The Marriage Caper (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: Tin Can Man (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Morticia, the Matchmaker (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Devil's Own (1997)
Appraisal: Everyone has their reasons here, and the process of reparation of injustice often becomes a big bloody mess. The underlying theme appears to be the seduction of weaponry, both big and small. I am not sure this is really what the filmmaker had in mind, though; the storyline is a bit prolix and feels rather unfocused. It's a bleak film, at any rate.
Rating: 40
Alfred Hitchcock Presents: The Derelicts (1956) (TV)
Appraisal: Possibly the best episode so far; an excellent story, and a very fine performance by Newton.
The Munsters: Autumn Croakus (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Guess What Happened on the Way to the Moon? (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: My Hero (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: My Fair Munster (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Halloween with the Addams Family (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: Low-Cal Munster (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: The Lady in the Bottle (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: This Is Murder (1966) (TV)
Synopsis [spoilers]: Tony is assigned to escort a Middle Eastern princess on a visit to the United States. When Jeannie sees her photo she recognizes an enemy of ages ago -- their respective families have an old feud; Jeannie swore to kill her, and is determined to do so. Tony lies to Jeannie, saying that the visit was postponed for a year and then sends Jeannie on three different tasks around the world -- to make him a yacht on the desert of Gobi, a ski station in Bermuda, and a pineapple plantation in Alaska. He expects the princess to be gone by the time Jeannie gets back from her assignments. However, she finishes earlier than expected and the princess is still there. The two women have an argument and the princess leaves the premises. Jeannie is so furious she turns Tony into a parrot, and leaves. When she comes back, she is calmer and turns him back into human form. She says that she has given up her murderous intentions, after she had a talk with the princess -- after all, the two of them had something in common: their love for Tony. Roger asks Tony if he can have the yacht, the ski station and the pineapple plantation. Jeannie turns him into a parrot.
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: A Walk on the Mild Side (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Sunday, April 27, 2008
The Addams Family: The New Neighbors Meet the Addams Family (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: Munster Masquerade (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: My Master the Thief (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: My Master, the Great Rembrandt (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Saturday, April 26, 2008
The Munsters: Pike's Pique (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Gomez, the Politician (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Friday, April 25, 2008
Pay Day (1922/I)
Appraisal: Delightful little film, full of charm and inventivity. I have to see it again though, for the finer details. Note: I have seen the version with 21:06 min of length, which is included in the DVD box "The ChaplinRevue".
Rating: 70
Sunday, April 13, 2008
The Pilgrim (1923)
Appraisal: This is my second viewing of it, but to be honest I had no recollection of any of it. According to my notes, I didn't like it much the first time, which is a mystery to me, since it is a respectable and entertaining movie. Note: this time, I saw the version contained in The Chaplin Revue (1959), which has a length of 39:40 min. I have no idea which one I saw the first time.
Rating: 65 (up from 45)
Friday, April 11, 2008
The Munsters: Herman's Lawsuit (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
The Addams Family: The Addams Family Tree (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Bond (1918)
The Munsters: A Visit from the Teacher (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Bigger Than a Bread Box (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Permanent House Guest (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: A Visit from Johann (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Shoulder Arms (1918)
Deleted Scenes: What happens before Charlie goes to war is narrated here. We first see Charlie strolling on the sidewalk with three little kids. Charlie stops to have a drink at the bar, then returns to the kids. Charlies arrives in his house and says goodbye to the kids. Inside, he is continuously scolded by his wife, who is outside the frame at all times. She keeps throwing objects at him, and ordering him about. Charlie has to hang some clothes (enormous, implying she is very obese), cook, etc. A letter arrives, it's apparently some propaganda encouraging enlistment. Charlie decides to enlist, and he proceeds to be physically examined. We see him through the door glass, but only his shadow and the doctor's are visible. The doctor inserts a spoon in his mouth, which he accidentally swallows, then the doctor tries to retrieve the spoon with pliars, Charlie swallows the pliars, then the doctor fishes them out with line and hook, then he retrieves the spoon by punching Charlie in the chest.
Appraisal: Entertaining enough.
Rating: 60
A Dog's Life (1918)
Note: I saw the version contained in The Chaplin Revue (1959), with duration 32:30 min.
Appraisal: The ingenuity of the whole structure, as well as the skill displayed in individual set-pieces are enough for a jolly good time.
Rating: 70
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
I Dream of Jeannie: Watch the Birdie (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: How Lucky Can You Get? (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: A House Divided (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Fester's Punctured Romance (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Monday, April 07, 2008
The Munsters: Herman's Sorority Caper (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Jeannie and the Kidnap Caper (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: My Master, the Doctor (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Morticia Joins the Ladies' League (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Bicycleran (1987)
Synopsis: Nasim is an Afghan immigrant in Iran. He has no means to pay for his sick wife's hospital expenses, so he agrees to perform an endurance show for a greedy manager: he will ride his bicycle non-stop for seven consecutive days.
Appraisal [spoilers]: I don't know whether it's my fault or this film's, but several plot points remain obscure to me, for instance, when Nasim's son is told to offer his father money for quitting the race, I could not understand whether Nasim tells him about the offer -- first he is prevented to approach his father and later he manages to do so, but we never see him talking to him about it. There is also a feeble subplot about a political conspiracy, its most implausible moment being when Nasim receives a phone call accusing him of being a spy. The film is often caricatural, for instance the recurring scene of her mother having difficulty to breathe and trying to reach for the oxygen mask. It also has some badly directed scenes, for instance when the kids hide under the hospital bed and the doctor arrives; he staggers his way unto the bed and then clumsily drops a jar on the floor, which appears to imply he is drunk, yet the way he walks resembles less a drunken man's stagger than a physically disabled person's. There is also a truck who is recruiting Afghan workers, and near the ending we see it again but this time the workers don't seem to flock to it; I don't understand what exactly has happened. The social critique in this film is acerb; in one grotesque scene, juvenile delinquents who have been brought in to watch the show are urged to learn that this man's honesty and perseverance are much preferrable to a life of crimes.
Rating: 31
I Dream of Jeannie: Richest Astronaut in the World (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Get Me to Mecca on Time (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Munsters: The Musician (1966) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
The Addams Family: Morticia and the Psychiatrist (1964) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Saturday, April 05, 2008
I Dream of Jeannie: Too Many Tonys (1965) (TV)
(Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.)
I Dream of Jeannie: What House Across the Street? (1965) (TV)
(Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.)
Friday, April 04, 2008
The Munsters: Zombo (1966) (TV)
(Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.)
The Addams Family: The Addams Family Goes to School (1964) (TV)
This is the first episode of this series based on Charles Addams's cartoons published mainly in the 30's in the New Yorker magazine.
(Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.)
Le train (1973)
Synopsis: When the Germans invade France in 1940, many people start fleeing their cities. The film centers on a man who leaves his house and city; he is accompanied by his pregnant wife and daughter. They board a train, only they must go in different cars -- first class is for women, children and older people only. He meets a beautiful Jewish woman and falls in love with her. The car he is in gets separated from the one his wife is in. Based on the novel by Georges Simenon, 1st ed. 1961.
Appraisal: To decide whether this film is far-fetched is somewhat beside the point; it is clearly devised with that apparent far-fetchedness in its center. The important fact is, it works fine dramatically, and so it may be considered a success; the ending may have carried the romanticism a little too far though.
Rating: 61
The Addams Family: The Winning of Morticia Addams (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Russian Roulette (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
I Dream of Jeannie: Where'd You Go-Go? (1965) (TV)
Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.
Thursday, April 03, 2008
Top Cat: Hawaii Here We Come (1961) (TV)
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
The Addams Family: Lurch, the Teenage Idol (1965) (TV)
(Saw it dubbed in Portuguese.)
The Goldbergs: Money for Seeds (1938) (radio)
Comment: As you probably have gathered from the above synopsis, it was impossible for me to understand what was being said at certain spots.
Alfred Hitchcock Presents: Shopping for Death (1956) (TV)
Appraisal: Interesting stuff; no surprise ending.
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Lavoura arcaica (2001)
Synopsis: The intermediary son of an agrarian family flees home and his elder brother goes after him and finds him. Based on the novel by Raduan Nassar (1st ed. 1975).
Appraisal: As has already been pointed out around the time of its cinematic release, this film is totally subservient to the source novel, being flooded by omnipresent voiceover and extremely verbose dialogue (or monologue, as is perhaps the case at times). I haven't read the source novel but, based on Nassar's novella Um Copo de Cólera, which I have, and on what is heard and seen in this film, both his style and plots seem parodic (or self-parodic, perhaps) to me. I seem to be the only one who thinks that way; this filmmaker, for one, surely doesn't, judging by the evidence of the "quality TV" gloss with which he imbues the movie, and of which he is the certified King. Here and there, real emotion seeps in, as in the scene of André by the farm's gate, being regarded by his mother.
Rating: 33
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Forever Young (1992)
Appraisal: This completely befooled me for a while. I was expecting something along the lines of Sleeper (1973) or Idiocracy (2006), which have a similar premise but are set in the future. However this film took a different turn and the subject of the comparison between different periods is not tackled except in the most casual manner (e.g., regarding television he comments simply that he had already seen it on the 1939 fair). Only in the last scene did I realize what this is actually about, and perhaps got a clue what the title is about also, a sense of irony by the filmmakers being implied. That being said, I am not entirely convinced that the long path it takes to make its point -- act now, don't procrastinate, you will not remain forever young -- is rewarding enough from a dramatic standpoint.
Rating: 41
She's Gotta Have It (1986)
Appraisal: This is situated in the frontiers of irrelevance, and yet it is kind of watchable, maybe because the characters have some amount of definition.
Rating: 32
Saturday, March 29, 2008
David and Saul (c1912)
http://biblefilms.blogspot.com/2006/03/early-films-about-david-and-saul-1911.html
and at
http://biblical-studies.ca/blog/wp/2006/03/16/king-saul-on-the-silver-screen-an-early-film-about-saul-and-david/ .
I will reproduce those pages below, almost in their entirety. The former page is by Matt Page. There it goes.
*begin quote*
Friday, March 03, 2006
Early films about David and Saul (1911-1913)
The final films on the DVD I've been discussing this week are both about the Hebrew King Saul; David et Saul (David and Saul) made in 1911 and La Mort de Saül (The Death of Saul) made two years later in 1913.
These films are also made by Pathé Frères and not listed in Campbell and Pitts' "The Bible on Film". They do list two other related films David and Goliath (1908) and Saul and David (1909), which is also listed on the IMDB . What is unusual about these two films is the subject material they choose to handle, particularly given that only a couple of films based on 1 Samuel had been made by this point. I imagine if you asked a modern day viewer which episodes from the books of Samuel they were most familiar with they would firstly list David and Goliath, and then perhaps David and Bathsheba, or the calling of Samuel, or the anointing of Saul or David. I'm not sure whether it's a sign of how much the parts of the bible we focus on have changed so much in 95 years, or that, even upon its release, they were unusual choices. Suffice to say none of the above scenes are in either of these films, the details of which are below:
David and Saul (1911)
David returns from beating the Philistines - (1 Sam 17/ 1 Sam 18:27)
David marries Michal - (1 Sam 18:27)
Saul grows jealous - (1 Sam 18:6-9)
David feigns madness whilst in hiding - (1 Sam 21:10-15
Saul slaughters the priests - (1 Sam 22:6-18)
David hides from Saul - (1 Sam 23:24-28)
Death of Saul (1913)
Saul slaughters the priests - (1 Sam 22:6-18)
The Witch of Endor - (1 Sam 28)
The death of Saul - (1 Sam 31:1-6)
What we do see is a great deal of attention given to Saul ordering the killing of the priests of Nob, which appears in both films. The review of The Death of Saul at IMDb notes how:
"The story of David and Saul is an interesting and ambitious choice of material, and this short feature does a creditable job of filming it. The story has plenty of action, plus some significant psychological themes, and this movie succeeds in bringing out at least some of both."
In my opinion the most successful biblical films have been those that use less familiar material to challenge our pre-conceptions, or are at least more concerned with trying to explore their protagonist's motives.
A few notes:
It's interesting that the first film starts with a celebration of David's victory over the Philistines. I put chapter 17 as a possible reference, but that's probably just re-coiling from the fact that the most likely victory this refers to is the one where he gives 200 Philistine foreskins to Saul as a wedding dowry (1 Sam 18:27). Certainly the fact that at the end of the scene Saul holds David and a very un-cinematic Michal together indicates that it is this victory which is being celebrated.
Although this film doesn't actually show the incident where David chooses not to kill Saul when he had the chance, it does refer to it in the intertitles "Fatigued Saul seeks repose in the cave where David was hidden". However, instead of seeing David cut Saul's cloak or steal his spear, the scene following this intertitle seems to portray David hiding on the other side of the mountain (1 Sam 23:24-28). The film crams a lot in, in a very short time, and it's hard for the viewer - even if they have a good knowledge of the various stories - to work out what is being depicted.
The break between the two films on the DVD I have is very slight, and most of the scant discussion of these two films on the web seems to treat them as one. In fact I noticed that the title of the film, placed at the top of each intertitle, changed before I noticed the briefly shown intertitle card that announced the new film.
The second film is two years later, and the filmmakers have significantly improved in that time. The use of a red colour wash during the sacking of Nob is quite effective, as is the use of special effects when Samuel appears in the witch's cave. There's also a really impressive scene (coming soon) where a large crowd of Philistines rush past the camera into the battle. Except for the old black and white celluloidthe way this action is filmed is on a par with anything today, and is the most impressive sequence I can recall at any point before Birth of a Nation revolutionised film in 1915.
It is interesting how the second film paraphrases Saul's prophesy into three clauses and then shows each happening in turn:
"Thy armies shall be delivered into the hands of the PhilistinesThy sons shall perishThy sword shall avenge the God of Israel"
It's not quite what Samuel says (1 Sam 28:19), but the way the film takes each clause and shows it happening is a far more sophisticated narrative device than was standard for the era.
Finally, although the second film is about the same length as the first it takes things much more slowly. The emphasis here seems to be much more on Saul and what is happening to him internally, than the events that are happening around him. It also allows a chiastic structure to the events. The film starts with Saul destroying the priests of Nob, and ends with him being destroyed by them, separated only by an announcement of God's judgement upon him, and linking the two actions nicely together.
Matt
Labels: David
posted at 2:10 PM © Matt Page 2005-2008
*end quote*
The second web page I gave at the beginning is reproduced, almost in its entirety, below. Its author is Tyler F. Williams.
*begin quote*
King Saul on the Silver Screen: An Early Film about Saul and David
16th March 2006
I recently bought on eBay a DVD with a silent film from the early 1900s about Saul and David. The amateur DVD is entitled, “Early Religious Films” and besides the film on Saul and David, it includes two other early Jesus films. Matt Page over at Bible Film Blog purchased the same DVD and has blogged on the two Jesus films here and here, and the Saul and David film here. As Matt noted in his blog entries, identifying these films is a bit challenging. The distributor who made the DVD from old reels doesn’t have any further information on the films included. In particular, a major problem with the Saul and David film is trying to determine whether or not it is one film or two. Matt thinks what is on the DVD is actually two films, a film called “David and Saul” and another film called “The Death of Saul.” Matt’s summary of this film is excellent and I encourage you to read it. I thought I would offer my own slightly different take on this early film about Saul and David.
Identification
According to my research, in the early 1900s there were four films made that focused particularly on the reign of Saul, the first king of Israel, and his stormy relationship with David. My primary sources for this information are:
Richard Abel, The Ciné Goes to Town: French Cinema 1896-1914 (University of California Press, 1994; Buy from Amazon.ca Buy from Amazon.com)
Richard H. Campbell and Michael R. Pitts, The Bible on Film: A Checklist, 1897-1980 (Scarecrow Press, 1981; out of print)
Jon Solomon, The Ancient World in the Cinema (Revised & Expand edition; Yale University Press, 2001; Buy from Amazon.ca Buy from Amazon.com)
As I piece the various lists together, there are four early films on Saul and David. In chronological order they are:
Saul and David. This early American film was directed by J. Stuart Blackton with the scenario written by Madison C. Peters. Produced and distributed by Vitagraph in 1909. [Noted in Campbell and Pitts, 3; Solomon, 5, 166; IMDb]
Saul and David [Saül et David]. A French film produced and directed by Léon Gaumont in 1911. [Noted as “lost to the ages” in Campbell and Pitts, 5; Solomon, 7]
David and Saul [David et Saül]. Produced by the French studio Pathé-Frères and distributed by their export office C.G.P.C. in 1912. Campbell and Pitts has this film listed as “Saul and David” while IMDb has it as “David and Saul.” In addition IMDb notes this film was directed by André (Henri) Andréani and dates it to 1911. This identification is plausible since Andréani directed many of Pathé-Frères biblical films in this period; the earlier date likely represents its actual production date, while the later date is its American distribution. [Noted in Campbell and Pitts, 5; Solomon, 7; IMDb]
The Death of Saul [La Mort de Saül]. This French film was directed by André (Henri) Andréani with the scenario written by Eugène Creissel with Louis Ravet playing Saul. It was produced by Pathé-Frères in June 1912, while its American distribution date is typically listed as 1913. 12 minutes long. [Noted in Abel, 319; Solomon, 7, 141; and IMDb]
The challenge with identifying the film on the DVD is that, based on the intertitles, it appears to be two films spliced together. The first three intertitles include the title “David and Saul” in small print at the top of the frame; then there is a full-frame intertitle introducing “The Death of Saul” while the rest of the intertitles in film have “The Death of Saul” in small print at the top. In addition, while there is remarkable consistency between the two sections in regards to costuming and it appears Louis Ravet plays Saul in both parts, the actor playing Saul’s son Jonathan is different between the two sections.
Matt Page identifies the first part with the 1911/12 film “David and Saul” and the second part with the 1912/13 film “The Death of Saul.” This identification is more than likely correct, since both films are by the same studio. From the discussion in Abel (which is based on the version of the film in the Library of Congress archives), however, it is clear that the “Death of Saul” on the DVD does not include its original beginning. Perhaps that is why excerpts from “Saul and David” were included at the beginning.
What should be clear from this discussion is that figuring out the early history of Bible related films is challenging to say the least!
Analysis
The origin of the film aside, the version that I have consists of two main sections, Saul and David and the Death of Saul. Here is my breakdown and discussion of the two parts (my divisions are based primarily on the intertitles):
David and Saul
This part of the film may be divided into three sections based on the intertitles. It’s camera work is pretty basic, consisting of almost exclusively of stationary longshots.
David, conqueror of the Philistines, asks Saul to Keep his Promise [to give his daughter Michal in marriage]
This section is based on 1Sam 18:27 and has David returning from battle, being greeted by a portly Jonathan, and being given Michal in marriage by Saul.
Jealous of David’s Popularity, Anger Invades Saul’s Heart.
This section consists of five scenes. The first has Saul in his palace looking out at the crowds who are evidently praising David’s military prowess (inspired by 1Sam 18:7). The second scene, based on 1Samuel 19 (cf. 19:1, 17), shows a confrontation between Saul and a group consisting of Michal, Jonathan, and some others. Saul is evidently asking for the whereabouts of David, but he leaves none the smarter. The third scene shows a dejected looking David and his motley crew of followers at the cave of Adullam (1Sam 22:1-2). Note that Matt Page identifies this scene as “David feigns madness whilst in hiding” based on 1 Sam 21:10-15. The problem with this identification is that the setting is does not appear to be Achish and David doesn’t look too insane (at least he’s not scratching marks on gates or drooling). The fourth scene is very roughly based on 1Sam 22:6-18. It has Saul going to the sanctuary at Nob and confronting Ahimelech the priest about David’s whereabouts (I say only roughly, since in the biblical account the priests are brought to Saul). Ahimelech refuses and is then killed by a nasty looking Doeg the Edomite. The fifth and final scene of this section has Saul and his guard leaving in search of David.
Fatigued, Saul Seeks Repose in the Cave where David was Hidden.
This third and final section appears to be cut off prematurely. It is made up of two brief scenes based on 1Sam 24:1-3 (not 1 Sam 23:24-28 as Matt Page suggests). The first has Saul and his guard coming to a cave in the wilderness of En-gedi and Saul going into the cave to relieve himself (for more on the euphemisms used in this passage see my post here). The second scene shows David and his followers within the cave hiding themselves from the approaching Saul.
The Death of Saul
The second part of the film is, as Matt noted, of a higher quality and shows more innovation in camera work. It includes a pan shot as well as some ambitious outside action shots. It consists of seven parts of various lengths.
Saul Decides that the Priests and Other Inhabitants of the City shall be Slain.
This scene somewhat accurately represents the story in 1Sam 22:11-19 where Saul (in his palace) decides to kill Ahimelech and put the entire city to the sword. Interestingly, Abel, in his discussion of the film, mistakenly identifies the besieged city as Keilah (1Samuel 23). This is quite unlikely, especially considering Saul gave up his expedition against Keilah once he heard that David had fled the city.
Jonathan Endeavors to Avert the Massacre.
This section is quite long and involved, consisting of at least seven different scenes. The first two scenes of Jonathan fleeing the palace and warning Ahimelech of the coming massacre does not appear to be inspired by any biblical passage. The next scene has the priest going out and praying for the inhabitants of the city. Then the fourth scene shifts to Saul and his guard leaving the palace. The next three scenes has Saul and his army entering the city of Nob and burning it and putting it to the sword. These scenes employ some of Pathé’s patented special effects of red smoke and small explosions. The final scene of this section shows Saul receiving a written message just leaving the city. The message, which is signed by David, is presented on an intertitle. It says, “O King, know thou that the Philistines have gathered together to do battle with us. May the God of Israel protect us.” This may be based on 1Sam 23:27, though one cannot be sure.
Saul Seeks the Witch of Endor.
This section consists of two scenes based on 1Sam 28:3-8. The first has Saul encamped at Gilboa in fear of the Philistines who are assembled against Israel at Shunem. While the second has Saul leaving camp with two men to inquire of the medium at Endor since the Lord did not answer him. This second scene includes a primitive pan shot as the three men are walking towards Endor.
The Witch Evokes the Spirit of Samuel.
This section, taken from 1Sam 28:8-25, begins with a scene with Saul and the two men coming to the cave where the witch lives and then there is an interesting close-up bridge shot of Saul going down the narrow tunnel to the cave entrance alone. The scene where the disguised Saul asks the witch to consult Samuel has some interesting camera shots. Samuel appears on the cave wall with a flaming special effect and fade in shot and then later disappears with a straight cut. Samuel’s message to Saul, paraphrased from 1Sam 28:18-19, is included on an intertitle. Interestingly, the next three sections of the film are introduced by intertitles including excerpts of this message.
Thy Armies Shall be Delivered unto the Hands of the Philistines.
This section starts with Saul returning to the Israelite encampment, cuts to an amazing scene of the Philistine army rushing the Israelites, and ends with Saul and his army rushing out to meet them.
Thy Sons shall Perish.
This brief scene includes a son of Saul coming back from battle and dying in Saul’s arms (if this is Jonathan, then it is a different actor from the first film as noted above), Saul lamenting and then falling on his sword.
They Sword shall Avenge the God of Israel.
This final scene shows Saul dying — with, of course, the sword handle appropriately protruding from his belly!
Final Thoughts
There are a number of noteworthy things about this early film. First, as perhaps is clear from the various departures from the biblical storyline, that even in the early days of cinema films were interpretations of the biblical story. The scenario writer and director crafted their story with liberty to modify the biblical version as they thought appropriate. Second, what the film chose to focus on is interesting. The attention given to the massacre of the city of Nob and the visit with the witch of Endor likely stem from a number of things, including the simple desire to show off some of the special effects. Finally, I have to concur with Matt Page when he notes, “the most successful biblical films have been those that use less familiar material to challenge our pre-conceptions, or are at least more concerned with trying to explore their protagonist’s motives.” In this regard, I found this film to be quite intriguing.
For a complete listing of films based on the Hebrew Bible, please see my Old Testament on Film pages.
*end quote*
Gone Baby Gone (2007)
Appraisal: Quite well directed. The several situations and characters develop in an interesting way, but the whole is less than compelling; it's a sort of formulaic structure designed in such a way as to insert bleak social -- and moral, if you will -- commentary into a mystery plot with some action set-pieces thrown in for good measure.
Rating: 64
Friday, March 28, 2008
Waterborne (2005)
Appraisal: Even though the filmmaker shows some ability on some individual scenes, the film as a whole is very poor, both in psychological characterizations, and in showing the progression of the crisis.
Rating: 25
Buona Sera, Mrs. Campbell (1968)
Appraisal: Very bland comedy, with a very weak premise which resolves itself quite easily in the end, which was to be expected since it didn't make much sense from the beginning. The dialogue constantly tries to insert risqué allusions, which seem very dated and contrived.
Rating: 32
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Where's Marlowe? (1998)
Appraisal: Second viewing. Thematically akin to Real Life (1979) and Guy (1997). Entertaining and funny, but its limitations became more evident on second viewing.
Rating: 65 (down from 69)
The Death of Christ (c1900)
*begin quote*
Thursday, March 02, 2006
Death of Christ (c.1900)
Following on from the last two days' posts where I have been looking at a couple of very early Jesus films, I wanted to post today, in more detail on the second of these The Death of Christ. It was hard enough trying to date The Life of Christ, but at least it provided a date to be sceptical about! With this film I would place it at around the same time, maybe even slightly earlier than The Life of Christ, but I wouldn't place it any early than the date claimed at the start of the Life of Christ. Anyway - the full discussion of that was two days ago.
This film is actually more interesting to right about than the earlier one since whereas that film largely contained material that was incorporated into The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. Whilst this film is shorter (only 10 minutes long), most of the material is original to this film. First things first the scenes guide with scripture citations.
Last Supper (start of) - (Mark 14:16-17)
*Gethsemane - (Mark 14:32-42)
*Arrest of Jesus - (Mark 14:43-46)
*Trial before Pilate - (Mark 15:1-14)
*Scourging & Mocking - (Mark 15:15-20)
*Presented before the People - (Matt 27:24-26)
Road to the cross - (Luke 23:26-28)
*Crucifixion - (Mark 15:22-33)
*Death of Jesus - (John 19:30,34)
*Resurrection - (Mark 16:1-8)
Ascension - (Luke 24:50-53)
A Few Notes
*These scenes are different from those in The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ, although in many cases they have strongly influenced that film, with it being really clear that it re-filmed some scenes almost exactly the same, with only minor "improvements". A good example of this is the trial of Jesus in front of Pilate where in this film it is not very clear that Barabbas is present, whereas in the later The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ Barabbas is far more distinct. The shot is very similar in most other respects.
Only three scenes then are used in The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. Firstly, the last supper, where the scant footage shown here is actually that which immediately preceds the longer scene in The Life and Passion. Next is the road to the cross scene, and finally, the ascension scene. These last two scenes are actually in all three films. The latter scene is far more complex than any of the other scenes in this film, and has been reasonably well done so it is not surprising that no-one went to the trouble fo re-filming it.
Two further points. Firstly, in comparing the scenes here with the Life of Christ, I noticed that that film seems to jump from the money-changers scene straight to Jesus's trail. Even for viewers who know the story this is a strange move. It does make me wonder if some of the material here was at one stage part of that film.
Secondly, of all three of these early films I think this is my favourite. This is partly because it is the least coloured, and the technique is a bit of a distraction, it's partly because it contains one really great scene - that in the Garden of Gethsemane, as well as being the source, I assume, for the innovative ascension scene. I also like the depiction of the scourging in contrast to The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. Here Jesus offers some resistance, there Jesus almost seems to volunteer for it. I wonder if this was the main reason that this scene was re-filmed as except for a difference in background it is more or less the same. I also much refer the resurrection scene. It's one of the hardest things to film, and film-makers have used a variety of approaches. This is one of the best. Fairly literal, and yet not sensational, kitschy, or cheesy. That said it doesn't really rely on any of the gospels (non of which describe the actual resurrection), and perhaps is most similar to Mel Gibson's version, but it's far more simple, and effective, and not nearly so pleased with itself.
All in all, I'm glad I've uncovered this early classic. Jesus films for the next 110 years have swung between the kitsch and the more profound, and I'm glad that at least one of the very earliest Jesus films falls into the latter category.
Matt
Labels: Life and Passion of Jesus Christ
posted at 9:04 AM © Matt Page 2005-2008
*end quote*
The Life of Christ (c1900)
*begin quote*
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Life of Christ (1898)
Yesterday's entry looked at the problems of dating some early films picked up on eBay. Today's post will look at the first of those (as it arrived on the disc), The Life of Christ, purporting to be from 1898. The film is just 14:23 minutes long, and none of the actors' names are given. Here's the scene order (as ever, scripture citations are in the normal format.)
Angels and Joseph's Dream - Matt 2:13-14
Escape to Egypt - Matt 2:15
*The Boy Jesus and the Doctors - Luke 2:40-52
Baptism - Mark 1:6-11
*Woman at Samaria - John 4:4-29
†Feeding 5000 with Fish and Bread - Mark 6:30-44
Christ Walks on Water - Mark 6:47-48
*Entering into Jerusalem - Mark 11:1-10
*Driving out the Money Changers - Mark 11:15-19
Trial before Pilate - Mark 15:1-15
*Ecce Homo - John 19:5
(Veronica) - Tradition
Road to the cross - Luke 23:26-28
Crucifixion - Mark 15:22-33
Death of Jesus - John 19:30,34
Resurrection - Mark 16:1-8
Acension - Luke 24:50-53
A Few Notes:
†This scene (the feeding of the 5000, or the "Fish and Bread" as the intertitles call it is the only one in the film without parallel in The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. That said...
*Scenes marked with a * are different from those in The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ, even if the later film copies / improves upon them. Sometimes the details are fairly minor (e.g. different actors or backgrounds), at other times the whole composition of the shot is fundamentally different.
Four scenes use camera trickery - essentially double exposure. The two appearances by angels in the first two scenes both use this technique fairly simply, but the resurrection scene, where Jesus floats out of his grave, and "Christ Walks on Water" are both a bit more sophisticated. The later is possibly significant as renown camera trickery pioneer George Méliès released a film in 1899 called Christ Walks on Water. This was thought to be the first part of the bible to be shown on camera outside of Jesus's Passion. Part of me wonders if this scene (later incorporated into The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ) was Méliès's original, and whether this effects the potential dating of this film.
The film starts in a strange place as well, not showing the nativity or any of the events leading up to it, but starting after the departure of the wise men as Joseph is about to have the dream that instructs him to take his family to Egypt. Having thought about the dating of the film more since yesterday, this was one piece of evidence I didn't really consider enough.
As with The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ this film was shot in black and white, but a number of scenes have been hand coloured. In addition some scenes stencil on extra details, most notably the Holy Spirit stenciled on as a dove in the baptism scene (see left) and the ascension scene.
In terms of episodes that rarely make Jesus films, obviously this film has nearly all of it's material in common with The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. Even so, both films show the Ascension in an unusual way, and in fact, depictions of this are rare in themself. The scene with the woman of Samaria is also fairly rare in film version of Jesus's life, which is unusual as it gives us a rare three dimensional female role. Directors are usually keen on such roles, note for example one of the most frequently filmed scenes outside of his Passion - the woman taken in adultery.
Finally, one comment that is often made about The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ is worth repeating here. As this was filmed in the very early days of cinema, it's very obvious from this film that even the most basic aspects of moviemaking have yet to be discovered. For example, the camera is always static, and the acting takes place in front of it - this works similarly to watching a play. In a similar vein, nearly all the action takes place in the middle distance. There are a couple of exceptions in this film, and these may have been the first films to pioneer these new techniques. The first is the Ecce Homo moment. The camera get that bit closer to Jesus, just showing his upper half as he stands in front of the words "Ecce Homo" behind him. The second is a shot of Veronica, after she has wiped his face. The camera cuts to a shot of her holding her cloth, close enough for the viewer to see she has a perfect image of Jesus's face upon it.
This film will probably be available from this seller on eBay as part of a compilation DVD Early Religious Films.
Matt
Labels: Life and Passion of Jesus Christ
posted at 10:00 AM © Matt Page 2005-2008
3 Comments:
(...)
At 2:45 AM, March 16, 2008, Antonio Ventaja said…
Sorry, I don´t speak and not wright in english ( I am spanish).I beliver that this film is La Vie et la Passion de Jésus-Christ of 1898 of directors Georges Hatot and Louis Lumière.Thanks for your blog.
At 3:11 AM, March 16, 2008, Matt Page said…
Thanks for that, I'm not sure I've heard that before.
Thanks
Matt
*end quote*
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
I Am David (2003)
Appraisal: Total incompetence are the defining words here, so let's not waste our time. The book is considered somewhat of a classic in literature for children, and the skeleton of the plot does reveal the possibility of a sound divertissement, which evidently was spoiled.
Rating: 16
Monday, March 24, 2008
Dark Blue (2002)
Appraisal: One of the better cop movies of the last few years. The interconnection among the several elements of the story is very well handled, and the film flows in a crescendo of action and dramatic tension right until the end. Gleeson's performance is absolutely amazing. Russell doesn't do so badly either.
Rating: 69
Le grand restaurant (1966)
Synopsis: The president of a foreign country disappears from a restaurant and a kidnapping is assumed; the restaurant's owner is summoned by the police to help find him.
Appraisal: It's practically two different films; it begins as a comedy set at a restaurant and later becomes a more action-oriented film. Both parts are moderately enjoyable.
Rating: 41
Les bronzés font du ski (1979)
Appraisal: Passable sequel.
Rating: 46
