Second viewing. I like it now. I didn't on my first viewing.
Here's what I wrote then (on April 28, 2007):
"Synopsis: A shop attendant at a department store begins a relationship with a
young man, who then follows a rock band on a tour. Meanwhile she meets a middle
aged rich man who wants her for fucking, and gives her expensive gifts.
Appraisal: Poorly written, often ridiculous drama that has an above average
leading duo of young performers and a delightful supporting performance (her
bimbo friend).
Rating: 12"
The synopsis is OK, but I can only guess why I thought it was "poorly written, often ridiculous" and why I thought it was a "drama" (well, that part is controversial, perhaps). The remarks about the performances were correct, though. The only explanation I can find for my negative comments (other than deeply encroached neuroses or plain stupidity) is that a fine screenplay badly directed is not so easy to distinguish from a bad screenplay well directed.
New Rating: 55
Observation: I saw it dubbed this time (but checked out some of the dialogue on paper.)
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment